- Deadly 6.0 Quake Hits Afghanistan, At Least 610 Dead - September 1, 2025
- Satellites Measuring Earth’s Changing Ice Sheets From Space - September 1, 2025
- Dust Storms in the Sahara and Their Far-Reaching Effects Across Oceans - August 29, 2025
The Greenwashing Epidemic Sweeping Corporate America
According to a 2024 survey of almost 1,500 environmental services industry professionals, nine in ten said greenwashing is prevalent, with four in ten calling it ‘very prevalent’ and a further five in ten saying it is at least ‘somewhat prevalent’. Yet here’s the thing that’ll surprise you: companies aren’t just failing to deliver on their green promises anymore—they’re getting better at hiding their deception. Greenwashing is the practice of making brands appear more sustainable than they really are, which may involve cynical marketing ploys, misguided PR stunts, or simply changing the packaging of an existing product while continuing to use unsustainable ingredients or practices. Think of it like putting a fresh coat of green paint on a rusty old fence—it looks better from a distance, but get closer and you’ll see the rot underneath. It’s no secret—corporations have made misleading claims or underdelivered on sustainability initiatives for years, but Greenwashed Out consumers see right through these deceptive antics. The game has changed, and consumers are catching on faster than companies can spin their stories.
When “Net Zero” Really Means Nothing at All
All these companies – which include such household names as Amazon, Google, H&M, Zara, Mercedes-Benz and Samsung – have set some form of ‘net zero’ target and many also make carbon-neutrality claims, yet the report reveals that nearly all the current climate claims or future net-zero targets are misleading, exaggerated or false. Here’s what’s really happening behind those fancy net-zero announcements: These dubious practices do nothing to cut current corporate emissions and the over-reliance on offsetting, or ‘insetting’, means that, together, the 24 companies analysed are committed to reducing their carbon footprint by only 36 per cent by the time they claim they will have attained ‘net zero’. Imagine promising to lose 100 pounds but only planning to shed 36—that’s essentially what these companies are doing with their emissions. If a company does not include Scope 3 emissions in its carbon accounting, it’s essentially useless, for example, Walmart, the world’s largest retailer, has an official strategy to reach zero emissions by 2040, yet its plan excludes Scope 3 emissions—despite the fact that they make up 95% of the company’s emissions, according to the company. It’s like a restaurant claiming to be healthy while only counting the calories in the garnish, not the actual meal.
The Truth About Those Green Labels You Trust
53% of green claims in Europe are vague, misleading, or unfounded, while 40% provide no supporting evidence, demonstrating the prevalence of greenwashing. Walking down any supermarket aisle today feels like navigating a maze of green promises that often lead nowhere. Many consumers struggle to verify environmental claims, find sustainability labels confusing, and lack confidence in their ability to distinguish truly sustainable packaging from greenwashing, with 88% of Generation Z consumers not trusting corporate environmental claims, highlighting persistent skepticism toward sustainability marketing, and more than 69% of buyers reporting that they do not always trust brands and retailers that claim to be sustainable, showing widespread doubt about corporate sustainability commitments. Additionally, 16% are put off by unclear labels, while 9% are wary of greenwashing, a practice in which companies falsely claim to be sustainable. The problem isn’t just that these labels are misleading—it’s that they’re designed to be confusing. This is greenwashing and it can come in many forms, with environmental claims being either lies, unsubstantiated, vague (‘natural,’ ‘sustainable,’ etc.) or irrelevant, and it is also possible that factual statements are misleading or legitimate certifications might be applied falsely to products, creating distrust and confusion for consumers.
How Major Brands Play the Offset Game
Instead of committing to deep decarbonisation by setting credible pathways to reduce their own emissions, many companies are choosing to ‘neutralise’ them, through the purchase of carbon credits on the voluntary carbon market (offsetting) or, even more questionably, within their own value chain (so-called ‘insetting’). Picture this: a factory pumps out smoke all day, then plants a few trees across the country and calls itself “carbon neutral.” That’s essentially how carbon offsetting works for many corporations. A report released in October by campaigning group Friends of the Earth argues that “nature-based solutions” to offset carbon emissions are founded on a flawed assumption that it is possible to trade off harm in one place with good intentions elsewhere, with each habitat being unique and irreplaceable, and forms of short-term carbon storage like trees or peatlands being inadequate substitutes for leaving fossil fuels in the ground—a more permanent form of carbon sequestration. Claiming to compensate for emissions and ‘cancel out’ all associated climate harm is a highly problematic corporate practice, often based on poor-quality carbon credits and flawed science. It’s like trying to cure a broken leg by putting a bandage on your arm—the math might work on paper, but the problem remains untreated. Some studies have found that planting nonnative trees in Canada and China on a large scale, for example, has disturbed natural ecosystems, worsened wildfires and depleted groundwater levels.
The Rise of Corporate Sustainability Theater
Active Super’s sustainability claims have been called out for what they are, and in June 2024, Active Super was found guilty by Australia’s Federal Court. Companies are getting more sophisticated with their sustainability theater, creating elaborate performances that look impressive from the audience but fall apart under scrutiny. McDonald’s: Despite their initiative to replace plastic straws with paper ones, McDonald’s has been criticized for the overall environmental impact of their operations, including sourcing practices and waste management. You might remember the controversy back in 2019 when McDonald’s introduced paper straws that turned out to be non-recyclable, which aside from the questionable practice of cutting down trees to make disposable straws, was a classic example of a corporate giant pretending to address an issue — in this case, plastic pollution — without actually doing anything. Coca-Cola: Frequently named the world’s largest plastic polluter, Coca-Cola is scrutinized for its “World Without Waste” campaign, which critics argue does not match up with its actual practices and waste generation. It’s like watching a magician—the show looks impressive until you realize they’re just moving the problems around instead of making them disappear.
When Governments Finally Fight Back
At the end of 2024, a report from RepRisk revealed a 12% decline in greenwashing cases, which is the first fall in six years, with the report stating that regulation is likely to have played a role in this downward trend. Regulators around the world are finally waking up to corporate greenwashing tricks, and they’re not amused. In 2024, corporate sustainability requirements will make it a lot harder for brands to greenwash their activities, with sustainability now sitting alongside financials, and everything being audited. In the EU, some of the strongest laws against greenwashing have been established – or are imminent, with the final green light to ban generic environmental labelling, without strict substantiation or certification, given in January 2024, meaning general claims like ‘climate neutral’ or ‘biodegradable’ will be banned if they’re not backed by proof. Governments are cracking down on corporate greenwashing, with South Korea introducing a draft law that would fine companies for falsely advertising environmental impact, and the EU issuing legislation to prohibit the use of claims like climate-neutral and environmentally friendly without proper accreditation. It’s about time—imagine if doctors could claim miracle cures without any evidence, and you’ll understand why this regulatory crackdown matters so much.
The Fashion Industry’s Dirty Green Secrets
Significant efforts are underway to reduce the fashion industry’s pollution – including through the UN-backed Fashion Charter – but greenwashing remains a challenge, with a recent report finding that 60 per cent of sustainability claims by European fashion giants are “unsubstantiated” and “misleading.” The fashion world has turned sustainability into just another trend, and like most fashion trends, it’s more about appearance than substance. Due to raw material extraction, long supply chains and energy-intensive production, the fashion industry is responsible for 2 to 8 per cent of global carbon emissions (for context, the shipping and aviation industry combined account for about 5 per cent of global emissions), and significant efforts are underway to reduce the fashion industry’s pollution – including through the UN-backed Fashion Charter – but greenwashing remains a challenge. Companies like H&M and Zara have built entire marketing campaigns around “conscious collections” while continuing to promote fast fashion business models that encourage overconsumption. But with one of the most influential marketing engines on Earth, the fashion industry has the potential to drive positive change and be a leader towards a more sustainable future, through both action and communications, with the Sustainable Fashion Communication Playbook being a guide for fashion communicators – marketers, brand managers, imagemakers, media, influencers and beyond – to help counter greenwashing and advance progress towards the Paris Agreement and Sustainable Development Goals. It’s like putting organic cotton on a conveyor belt that never stops—the material might be better, but the system remains broken.
The Technology Sector’s Carbon Accounting Magic Tricks
For example, the analysis suggested that Google — whose climate strapline reads “Carbon Neutral since 2007. Carbon free by 2030” — was overplaying its carbon neutrality hand, with major Scope 3 emissions, which accounted for 60 percent of Google’s greenhouse gas emissions in 2020, being omitted from the claim. Tech companies have mastered the art of creative carbon accounting, making their emissions disappear faster than files in a computer crash. A spokesperson for J.P. Morgan said in an emailed statement that it was setting carbon reduction targets for “key sectors” of its financing portfolio as part of its “Paris-aligned strategy,” including “Scope 3 targets for Oil and Gas, and Auto Manufacturing; announcing a $2.5 trillion, 10-year sustainable financing target to support the development and scaling of the innovative technologies that we need to get the world on a path to net zero, and achieving carbon neutrality in our operations every year starting in 2020.” The report found that several companies were only counting Scope 1 and 2 emissions — pollution derived directly from doing business, such as vehicle fuel and electricity for buildings — in their plans, omitting Scope 3 emissions, which are emissions produced across a company’s entire value chain (all its activities and processes that go into making a product or delivering a service), and often make up the vast majority of its carbon footprint. It’s like claiming your house is clean because you swept the front porch while ignoring the mess in every other room. For a net-zero target to be credible, it needs to include all relevant sources of emissions in the value chain, and for Scope 3, 90 percent of emissions need to be included.
How Consumer Fatigue Is Changing the Game
Green fatigue is sinking in, with consumers having made noticeable strides in recent years to protect the planet—in fact, more than 60% of consumers tried to have a positive impact on the environment in 2023—but climate catastrophes haven’t slowed down, with extreme weather events like intense wildfires, severe droughts and devastating floods wreaking havoc on communities around the world. Something interesting is happening in the consumer world—people are getting tired of being lied to about sustainability. Consumers realise that their individual contributions can only do so much, they’re tuning out messages that place the burden on their behaviour, instead they want organisations to step up and show proof of their eco pledges, and people who are Greenwashed Out won’t accept empty promises or false narratives. Over half (54%) of respondents reported deliberately choosing products with sustainable packaging in the past six months, and even more compelling, 90% said they are more likely to purchase from a brand or retailer if its packaging is eco-friendly. Barriers like affordability and distrust are big challenges preventing further action. It’s like the boy who cried wolf, but with corporate sustainability claims—after being deceived repeatedly, consumers are becoming skeptical of every green promise. This shift in consumer awareness is forcing companies to either get serious about sustainability or risk losing customers who can spot greenwashing from a mile away.
The Future of Honest Sustainability
It’s getting increasingly difficult for businesses to say one thing while doing another. The sustainability landscape is evolving rapidly, and companies that continue to rely on greenwashing tactics are playing with fire. Rather, what you should do is be open, honest and transparent about what you’re doing, don’t say you’re doing things that you’re not, don’t be afraid to mention the things that you’re doing, if you misstep, admit it, and if you have something to celebrate, go wild. It includes a ban on carbon and climate neutrality claims, based on emissions-offsetting schemes, that a product has a neutral, reduced or positive impact on the environment, with such claims only being allowed when they are based on the actual lifecycle impact of the product in question, and not based on the offsetting of greenhouse gas emissions outside the product’s value chain, as the former and the latter are not equivalent. Real sustainability isn’t about perfect marketing campaigns or clever word play—it’s about measurable actions and transparent reporting. As stakeholders are becoming more aware, it’s crucial for regulatory bodies to enforce strict guidelines against such deceptive practices, equipping consumers with the knowledge to discern truthful claims from greenwashed rhetoric is equally important, and moving forward, a collaborative effort among businesses, consumers, and regulatory bodies will be pivotal in transforming green marketing into an honest reflection of environmental responsibility. The companies that survive and thrive in this new landscape will be those that choose authenticity over artifice, substance over spin. The age of easy greenwashing is coming to an end, and honestly, it’s about time.
